We get it, running an agile retrospective meeting can be a challenge. We were tasked by my company (which shall remain unnamed) to compare the various online agile retrospective tools for our to use when running retro meetings so they can pick the right one for them. After relentlessly scouring the internet, we put together a comprehensive comparison table and breakdowns of the pros and cons of the top 9 tools available.

People tend to use retrospective meetings as an outlet to complain and bicker about their problems instead of actively trying to solve them. So as a BA turned scrum master working with a small team of other scrum masters, working with a few face to face, distributed and remote teams. We wanted something that was people-centered, action-oriented and tech friendly.

After getting great feedback from one of Our companies as to how valuable this resource was for making a decision on which online agile retrospective tool best suited the company’s needs and wants of an online retrospective tool. We decided to share my notes online as a little weekend project to help anybody looking for an online agile retrospective tool but aren’t quite sure which one to choose without the hassle of endlessly researching.

Here are our notes on the 9 retrospective tools that offer an online solution that can either augment, speed up or replace the more manual sticky note process. Now, there are certainly more than 9 out there, so my selection criteria were that they are designed standalone tools, had an appropriate level of security and were more than just a list builder or collaborative whiteboard. If you already use a mandated, company directed tool in JIRA or Confluence add-on, then this list might not apply to you.

Here’s the comprehensive comparison table of each retrospective tool:


TeamRetro
FunRetro (Paid)
ScatterSpoke
GroupMap
GoReflect
Retrium
Sprintlio
Parabol
Retrospective types
Customisable Retrospectives ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓
Template types 10+ 7 7 10+ 8 10+ 10+ 5
Retrospective formats Agile
Anchors & Engine
DAKI
FLAP
Four L’s
Mad Sad Glad
Starfish
Start Stop
Start Stop Continue
Wrap
Squad health Check
Team Health Check
Team Radar
Remote work happiness
Custom
Went Well – To Improve – Action Items
DAKI
Start stop continue
SWOT Analysis
Personal SWOT Analysis
Lean Coffee
Starfish Retrospective
Plus, Minus
Sailboat
4L’s
DAKI
Wish & Wonde
Starfish
WARP
Custom
4L’s
Agile
Anchors and Engines
DAKI
ESVP
WARP
FLAP
Force Field
Helped, Hindered, Hypothesis
Hot Air Ballon
Lean Coffee
Learning Matrix
Mad Sad Glad
Sail Boat
Starfish
Start Stop continue
Start Stop
Custom
Streaming
Mad Sad glad
SWOT
Brainstorm
Create your own board
Starfish
WWW, WDWW
Innovate
Plan a party
What went well, what didn’t go well
Mad Sad Glad
Start stop continue
4 L’s
Lean Coffee TM
WARP
Development Process
Development Practices
Work Happiness
Work Environment
Scrum Ceremonies
Scrum Values
Custom
4L’s
Agenda
Achors/Engines
Glad/Sad/Mad
Happy/Confused/Sad
KALM
Lean Coffee TM
Pros/Cons
Sailboat
Speedcar
Start Stop Continue
What went Well, What didn’t go well
Random
Glad Sad Mad
4L’s
Sailboat
Working & Stuck
Start stop continue
Custom
Health Checks
Team Radars
Mood Checker/ Analysis
Hand Drawn Templates
Meeting process / facilitation tools
Faciliated Workflow /stages
But can’t go back a stage

But can’t go back a stage
Time Boxing
Suggested Grouping
Drag-and-Drop Grouping
But can’t ungroup
Independent Dot Voting TBA TBA
Customisable Dot Voting
Idea Sorting
Presentation Mode
Anonymous and non anonymous brainstorming Anonymous only Anonymous only
Mobile Friendly
Comment On Ideas
Capture actions on ideas
Links actions to ideas
Action tracking (integrated)
Action reminders
Export options PDF, Excel, CSV, Email, Publish to workflow tool PDF, CSV PDF, CSV PDF,CSV, XLS, JPG Excel(actions only) None Unknown PDF, CSV
Enterprise ready
Reporting
Single Sign On ?
Share Scrum Master Role ?
Integrations Slack
JIRA
Azure DevOps
Github
Asana
Basecamp
Trello
Slack Slack
Jira
Trello
Slack Slack
Jira
Confluence
Slack
Jira
Security Link Link Link Link Link Link Link Link
Privacy Link Link Link Link Link Link Link
Governing Law USA, Australia, EU Brazil USA Australia, USA, EU USA USA Canada USA
Pricing
Pricing format Per team
Includes SSO / Integration
Per team
Includes SSO / Integration
Per Team Per Scrum Master/Facilitator Per User Per team
Enterprise set up costs extra
Per User Per User
Pricing for 8 teams
(10 per team) per month in USD
$120 $120 $128 $160 $203.20 $232 $240 $480
Trial Period 30 days 14 days Freemium 30 days 60 days 30 days 30 days Free for 2 teams

If you tend to like the old school sticky notes and butchers paper solution and don’t mind having to capture and digitize those notes as a separate exercise, then no harm, no foul. This can just be a good reference list if you have a team member who is away, working remotely, dialing in or you just want to change things up to experiment with how it might impact speed, number of ideas and overall team meeting cadence.

In this table above, I’ve outlined the key features that make an online agile retrospective tool great, and compared all the online tools. Some are pretty basic and don’t do much more than replicate the paper-based process of what you might do with the team. Other’s take it to the extreme where they might be scanning emoticon selection and user input to gauge sentiment (hmm …not sure about that in this regard.)

I’ve also considered some of the needs when Scrum masters run their meetings. Things like being, providing extra data or value to the retrospective process, fitting the credos of Agile and having a range of facilitator features to make the experience less time consuming and pain-free. Integration is another key component that my company asked for as you want to not just capture action items but also push them into your workflow, so that was a key decider in which tool to use.

Here’s the breakdown of the pros and cons of each retrospective tool: (These logos will take you to the breakdown of that tool)




TeamRetro Agile retrospectives made easy

TeamRetro on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

“TeamRetro is an enterprise-ready agile retrospective and health check tool for continuous improvement. Use in-built guided facilitation techniques to run worthwhile meetings. Each and every time.”

Pros to using TeamRetro

Easy and effortless, TeamRetro really is a very well designed and intuitive tool for running team retros as well as team radars and health checks.

The templates can be customized and replicated for reuse and there is a guided workflow for scrum masters and teams to help facilitate them towards discovering actionable solutions to a problem.  It’s enterprise-ready with SSO/SAML and integrates with JIRA, Asana, Trello, Slack, and others and is also mobile-friendly.

There are some nifty features like ideas sorting, grouping suggestions and a presentation mode as well as the ability to manually colour or highlight ideas. The fact that all your action items are linked to an idea and end up in a single perpetual list as well as for each retro makes post workflow management straightforward. The data collection techniques and variety for Radars and Health checks also means you can identify any issues and track progress over time. It has the right level of configurability and ease of use.

Cons to using TeamRetro

It’s hard to fault the current service offering for TeamRetro. Picking around the edges it doesn’t include a mood checker if you do that at each meeting. It doesn’t have a free version (just the standard 30-day trial) but it suits those teams that run retrospectives seriously. And while it’s not free, it’s the same price if not cheaper as the next “free” tool that ends up charging to access their premium features. The Team Health checks let you use icons (just happy, neutral or sad) and numbers and visualize that but you can’t add in your own icon sets. But for the vast majority, this really is nice to have.

TeamRetro testimonials

“I used Team Retro for the first time with my team and I’m in awe about this product. It’s practically EVERYTHING a retrospective tool for a remote team needs to be, look and feel like. Easy to use and intuitive, encourages collaboration, has a well located timer with an intuitive design, the discussion and action taking functions are brilliant in terms of design and implementation. Overall, I’m very impressed with Team Retro and so is my team. Team Retro is hands down the best retrospective tool I’ve used for remote teams so far. Really well done.”

Molood Ceccarelli
Founder of Remote Forever

“We’ve recently been using Team Retro and I’ve found it really useful and prefer it to GoReflect which I’d used for a few years (and ScatterSpoke before that).”

Chris Tromans
The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre



FunRetro Improve with fun sprint retrospectives

FunRetro on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

Collaborate with your remote team and get better in what you do with a simple, intuitive and beautiful tool

Pros to using FunRetro

FunRetro is relatively lightweight and offers a free public board feature which lets you share a URL with your team to get started straight away. If you aren’t too worried about security then the free version is worth checking out. However, it does have some feature limits as opposed to the paid plan. The interface is relatively simple and they provide the ability to clone templates you have created. You can toggle names and comments on and off.

Cons to using FunRetro

While it’s called ‘FunRetro’ there’s nothing specifically fun that’s built into it. Just like the other tools, you can customize retros with your own headers. Because it doesn’t have specific workflow built in, it does mean extra vigilance is needed to facilitate the team as you move through the process. We couldn’t unmerge ideas that were grouped and you do have to create a separate column to capture a list of actions. There are limited integration options and there are no private boards in the free version.

FunRetro testimonials

“It’s easy, it’s lightweight, it does what I need it to do. It’s the best real-life paper replacement I could find on the web.”

Henrik Mitsch
Open Innovation at Mozilla



Retrium The era of boring retrospectives is over

Retrium on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

“Keep your team engaged using Retrium’s wide variety of facilitation techniques. Continuous improvement starts here.”

Pros to using Retrium

Retrium is a funded start up who has raised $2.9M over 3 seed rounds and have created a retrospectives academy that helps new scrum masters especially understand and use their platform. Besides running the normal retrospective, you can also create Team Radars with spokes that you can define to allow you produce radars that show the average, medium, normal distribution and range of responses, along with a set of prompting questions that you can use to facilitate discussion. This then lets you focus your retrospective on identified gaps that the team may be experiencing as well as sense checking to see if you have good development processes and your team is aligned with Scrum values for example. If you like data analysis, then the range of analysis in the radars will appeal to you.

Cons to using Retrium

While the radars are pretty extensives there are some limitations to be aware of in terms of running your every day retro, especially given the higher cost. While you can create your own custom retro, you can’t save or replicate it so you do have to do it each time. Only anonymous brainstorming is supported. When prioritising, the number of dot votes is determined by an algorithm and is fixed based on the number of ideas presented. There’s no way to otherwise sort ideas or comment on ideas. You can capture ideas but they are not linked to ideas and lists can’t be shared.The way you move through the retrospective is also fixed, so once you move to the next stage, you can’t go back a step. It’s also hard to see what integrations they have, and the costs.

Another con to note is their user interface. While using it on mobile, it isn’t user-friendly.

Retrium testimonials

“Awesome for Sprint Retrospective… I like how it does not show names under the user’s input. People are more willing to add their opinion when they are anonymous.”

Kevin R
Quality Assurance Specialist



Sprintlio Agile retrospectives for distributed teams

Sprintlio on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

“Maximize your remote team’s performance with a powerful retrospectives tool that helps them stick together, supercharge participation, and boost accountability.”

Pros to using Sprintlio

As one of the pricier options, Sprintlio lets you run retrospectives that integrates a team health check as part of each meeting, sends you statistical information about your meeting and provides a dashboard that shows team participation and the number of action items completed Team sentiment is based on the number and type of emoticons used by participants during the retro and an emoticon based rating at the end of each meeting You can add additional documents, comments, code snippets and upvotes to ideas. In terms of idea capturing, the ideas are named and it’s up to each person to make their ideas anonymous. There is also a presentation mode that basically changes the contrast and size of font on the ideas and the option to run a randomly selected retro.

Cons to using Sprintlio

Each meeting is set up as perpetual meeting board, so there’s no facilitated step through of a process so it requires a lot of coordination of people to make sure they are focussing on the same activity. You can also only vote on 5 items at a time. Because the health check is built in, it’s hard to run this as a separate exercise. The interface can be a little crowded because of the steps being merged and the ability to add additional items, emoticons, code and the like to each idea. It also looked like we could not group ideas or merge them which means you will need another process to handle duplication. It feels like Sprintlio would be a good choice for retros that are run remotely and consistently (like a perpetual retro) where activities are constantly shifting and changing and you can revote on what priorities make the most sense at a time and you don’t need to change the format of your retrospective too much.

Sprintlio testimonials

“Our engagement has improved drastically. The product is excellent and does retros really really well.”

Mabel’s Labels



Parabol Engage. Empower. Execute.

Parabol on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

“Retrospectives that make good teams great”

Pros to using Parabol

Parabol, just like TeamRetro has a really nice user experience with their retrospectives, including mobile. They don’t offer health checks or radars but have a format called action meetings which is much like a Lean Coffee retrospective set up which you can run separate to retrospectives. They have anopening slide at the start of each meeting that prompts for verbal feedback using a randomized ice breaker question and a mood checker for the meeting that lets the team rate each meeting on an emoticon scale. You can create customized templates and save them. Actions can also be added and tagged as private.  An interesting feature is that you can ask the team to add emoticons to their comments. These are grinning, grimacing, grin, smile, smiley and joy.

Cons to using Parabol

Parabol is one of the priciest out there and is in some cases more than triple the price.They charge based on per active user per month rather than team so it does mean that when you don’t have a team member logging in, it doesn’t count.

However, since action meeting and retrospectives are pretty much done in app, it means that you’ll end up with most of the people logging in. Also, while there is a facilitated workflow, once you go forward to the next step, you can’t go back which means you have to manage asynchronous meetings with care. Voting is also set and limited to 5 votes. Having ideas default to named users is good, but for anonymity, the user needs to clock on each idea to make it anonymous. If you have 2 teams and under, then Parabol is free to use, but then after that, the team members are added to the count.

Another downside to Parabol is their poor mobile-friendly user interface, it didn’t make it easy to run an agile retrospective when half the team is using a mobile phone.

Parabol testimonials

“Parabol’s coaching and software was the key to unlocking performance on our leadership team. Our meetings went from business-as-usual to focused, fun, and productive.”

Ian Myers
GM of Platform, Quartz



GoReflect Continuous retrospectives for agile improvement

GoReflect on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

“Why wait for the retrospective to share your ideas for improvement with your team? With goReflect, you can share ideas anytime, anywhere.”

Pros to using GoReflect

GoReflect position themselves as a perpetual retrospective board, including a Stream style board that allows people to add ideas at any point. So there’s no start and end to a retrospective or facilitated flow but an ongoing retrospective board that allows you to post ideas, comments, likes (votes) and GIFS. The retrospective meeting itself would either not be needed or be used to do sense-making of the information that is actually in the board.  However, they state that having an open board allows for posting, updating and changing votes at any time, not just at the time of the retrospective. Pricing ranges from $2.67(1-49 people) to $1.87 per user (2000+) per month and they offer a 30- 90 day free trial.

Cons to using GoReflect

If your team essentially works with a perpetual retrospective and you aren’t too worried about too much information to manage, then goReflect is a good way to simply pick up from where you left off last time and to update the same board. You’ll have to manually archive items that are old and it does mean that you will have to pick and stick to one format for the length of a project. While they have built in template headers for general brainstorming, innovate and party planning, there are no health checks or different retrospective styles. Essentially if your team is looking for a Trello like perpetual board that produces a dashboard of cards and action items then it might be worth checking out goReflect. It was hard to see what integrations into other workflow existed at the time of checking it out.

GoReflect testimonials

“In my constant struggle to find the best tools for remote work I met goReflect and it worked so well I will definitely keep it in my toolbox for some time.”

Tomek’s blog



GroupMap Think better together

GroupMap on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

“The effective way to plan, brainstorm, discuss and decide – GroupMap helps your team think better together.”

Pros to using GroupMap

GroupMap is a really interesting tool. They are primarily a brainstorming and meeting collaboration tool with a huge range of templates, and customisable options that leaves you spoilt for choice. You can even add your own background image to brainstorm around and there are lots of facilitator options to manage participants, workflow and getting everyone from one stage of the process to the next, whilst still allowing you to go back a step if needed. What really stands out is that you can create not just a list, but also things like charts, blank walls and mind maps so you can use it beyond just a standard retrospective. There is also a survey and polling feature so you can create other question sets that are part of your retrospective. There are other ways of prioritising beyond dot voting and it’s like a Wix for meetings where you can create maps where people engage. There’s still independent voting, actions and reporting which can be exported. The cost is per facilitator rather than per team, although in some cases it could mean the same thing.

Cons to using GroupMap

GroupMap does not have Health Checks or Radars and uses basic polling and survey questions to fit that task. Grouping ideas is based on selecting or searching for common words and then creating a group from that rather than drag and drop. This can be useful if there are lots of ideas that are essentially the same. It does take a bit more time to set up a retrospective because there are options for choosing how you brainstorm, who can group and so on but you can then replicate and reuse the same workflow or map. The mobile aspect seems to only work well for list formats so you’ll need a device with larger screen if you want to go beyond list making activities. There is also limited integration and the outputs are predominantly in pdf, .xls and .csv formats.

GroupMap testimonials

“The meeting that I facilitated if from up my chain of command. Every exec in the meeting thought it was super easy and slick. It allowed the team to vote together, across geos/location, and instantaneously see the results … And helped us to quickly move to pick top themes, gain owners ( without the ego and debate).”

Mi Mae Ching
CISCO

“I love your product!  It is outstanding and provides a way to facilitate meetings and come to decisions through participation.”

Cinco Delgado
Retrospectives with GroupMap



RetroTime Start having retrospectives your team will love

RetroTime on laptop and mobile

What they have to say

Save time by collecting, organizing, and acting on important feedback from your team

Pros to using RetroTime

As the cheapest alternative on the market place (next to free that is), RetroTime is good if you want a lightweight tool and don’t mind doing a little fiddling around. Unlike the other retrospective tools that have preset templates, you first add an idea that you have to tag as something that went well, something that you could improve on or a cheers for peers. This is then placed on to a board where you can create additional categories. You can then upvote or downvote based on 3 dot votes. Simplicity seems to be the main thing here although it lacks functionality since it calls itself a fully featured retrospective tool. 

Cons to using RetroTime

The biggest downside is that it only really supports 1 type of workflow or retrospective. We couldn’t change the tag options and then we had to recreate categories for our retrospectives to then drag ideas into the right ones. We couldn’t sort the ideas based on votes and it was hard to see where the actions we captured went and were tracked. It was a bit troublesome having to tag each idea every time as it interrupted the train of thought. The cost price is low enough if you need an alternative to a free retrospective tool to see if your team loves it. 




Scatterspoke Stop wasting time in retrospectives

Scatterspoke on laptop and mobile

Scatterspoke testimonials

Review better data instead of trying to remember what happened

Pros to using Scatterspoke

ScatterSpoke is a well rounded online retrospective tool and although they don’t have health checks, radars or a facilitated workflow, their retrospective process works well. Similar to GoReflect, it feels like a perpetual retro that can be run continuously as there are no defined steps in the process. Scatterspoke is another free retrospective tool which can be used for some retrospectives which don’t require things like anonymity, private voting, integrations, timers and other facilitator controls. An interesting and rather novel aspect of Scatterspoke is that it reads through what teams have said on their cards and uses semantic analysis to track words that indicate what the team sentiment is from one retrospective to the next. (This is limited to your last 2 in the free version). This might be a way to use language choice as a way of seeing if your team is positive, neutral or negative. There is also the idea of a parking lot if ideas don’t fit into a category and can be reclassified at a later stage. So if you don’t’ suffer from FOMO and don’t mind seeing features you can’t have, then Scatterspoke is a great free tool that lets you gather and group ideas.

Cons to using Scatterspoke

The main thing about using ScatterSpoke as a free online retrospective tool is the limitations they place, so it then becomes a comparison against other paid tools. It’s more of a perpetual retrospective tool and isn’t too mobile friendly. You don’t end a retrospective, but you can lock the format. Actions are not standalone items but you can tag an idea an action item and also tag it against a category. The sentiment tracker should be reviewed with care as depending on how words are used in a sentence could change the data. Saying the last sprint was amazing versus I wish the last sprint was amazing could mean different things. You will also need to ensure that your Websockets are enabled to avoid delays in synchronization as we were getting warnings about the delay, although it was only a few seconds each time.




Did I miss something?

Or maybe I need to update some of the information… Feel free to shoot me an email and let me know!